stratm

Typed Analytics.

Schema-grounded analytics infrastructure - the contract between your codebase and behavioral data.

CONFIDENTIAL · PRE-SEED ROUND · 2026

Context

Software development just changed forever.

01

AI writes the code

Leading AI-native companies report 30–90% of new code is now AI-generated - Anthropic, Airbnb, and Microsoft leaders cite meaningful agent output in production. Humans review; agents ship.

02

AI reads the data

Amplitude AI, Mixpanel Spark, and every analytics platform is racing to add LLM-powered query layers.

03

The gap nobody solved

Faster codegen outpaces manual taxonomy upkeep. AI analytics layers query events that were never compile-time validated. Garbage in, sophisticated out.

Humans are no longer the right enforcement layer - tooling must. The companies that become trust infrastructure between AI-generated software and AI-powered analytics win the next decade.

The problem

Analytics breaks silently and nobody knows.

The engineer's pain

Ships a refactor → omits buy_cta

Dashboard metric silently drops to zero

Three days debugging to find a renamed event

✗ Rarely compile-time or repo-grounded validation. Trust breaks after deploy.

The PM's pain

Checkout funnel shows 2.3% conversion - or does it?

"Events were renamed in the last deploy" : you know 3 weeks later

AI analytics gives confident answers from unvalidated data

✗ No way to know what you're NOT measuring.

Competitive gap

Incumbents optimize for flexibility and downstream trust - not compile-time correctness.

Mixpanel

Lexicon and governance exist - but schema discipline is UI-defined and downstream, not compile-time and code-derived.

Validates after ingestion

Amplitude

Strong query and AI layers - but instrumentation correctness is enforced after data lands, not before deploy.

Post-ingestion validation

PostHog

Autocapture and schema tooling prioritize flexibility over a single repo-enforced structural contract.

Flexibility over contract

Segment

Decoupled destination routing (write once, send anywhere). Schema correctness is your problem.

Routing, not correctness

The insight

TypeScript gave JavaScript a type system.

It didn't replace JavaScript. It made application state trustworthy at scale.

TypeScript validates application state. Stratm validates behavioral state.

Typed Analytics. A schema-enforced, structurally-typed, version-controlled behavioral data layer, where every event is declared, every path is validated, and every change is tracked. Compile-time correctness for instrumentation, not just dashboards.

Stratm is building typed analytics infrastructure.

The product

Building instrumentation primitives, intelligence lenses, and infrastructure surface.

i · Instrumentation

Define and capture

MVP
Capture Schema

Studio Mode · Schema Health ship with MVP SKUs

ii · Intelligence

Analyze and act

MVP
Insights Journeys
MVP 1.5
Replay Prism Lineage Pulse

+ Heatmaps

P2
Experiments

iii · Infrastructure

Distribute and govern

MVP 1.5
Fabric

Integrations · Audiences

Shipping 9 products in MVP (Capture, Schema, Insights, Journeys, Lineage, Replay, Prism, Pulse, Fabric) · Studio Mode & Schema Health are features of Capture.

Technical differentiation

Structural data. Not just events.

Typical event payload

{
  "event": "click",
  "element": "buy_cta",
  "timestamp": 172946…
}

What Stratm stores

{
  "structure": {
    "path": ["checkout","order_summary","submit_order"],
    "depth": 3,
    "schema_version": "v1.4"
  }
}
Structural Journeys Which paths through your UI hierarchy lead to conversion supplimented by static schema manifest.
Schema Health CLI knows every element that exists. You see exactly what you're NOT measuring.
Schema Lineage Every event is version-bound. Metric drops are automatically correlated to code changes.

The moat

The schema manifest is load-bearing infrastructure.

The manifest is table stakes. The moat is the system primitive: one schema in the repo, enforced before merge, consumed by analytics, warehouses, and AI - not a settings screen after ingestion.

schema.json git commit hooks CI hooks enforce correctness AI analytics grounded Warehouse schema-enriched

Once schema.json is committed, CI hooks are wired, and downstream tools consume the Schema API, switching cost is not "cancel a subscription." It is rebuild your entire analytics data contract from scratch.

Market opportunity

Stratm sits at the convergence of product analytics, behavioral data infrastructure, and AI-era observability.

TAM · directional

~$18B–25B

Global spend at the analytics × infra × observability intersection

SAM · directional

~$1.5B–4B

Modern web & TS-native teams · structural capture viable

SOM · directional

~$250M–500M

Pre-seed → Series A ICP · bottom-up ARR path

Why now

Rising AI-assisted code share is climbing and taxonomy discipline cannot stay human-only; tooling must enforce correctness.
$3.2B Twilio acquired Segment in 2020 - routing infrastructure commanded a premium vs point SaaS.
Primitive No incumbent leads with compile-time, codebase-grounded schema as the primary system primitive.

Go-to-market

Bottom-up developer adoption → top-down PM retention.

Phase 1

Dev Adoption

HN launch, CLI on GitHub, agent prompt pack. Win vibe coders and AI-native builders. Schema commits to repos.

Phase 2

PM Lock-in

Schema Health shows gaps. PM sees value. Budget conversation begins. Renewal driven by Schema Health + Journeys.

Phase 3

Infrastructure

Schema API consumed by warehouse, AI tools, Amplitude. Switching cost becomes architectural, not contractual.

Key acquisition channels

Hacker News "Show HN: Typed Analytics for the AI era"
Agent Ecosystems LLM code editors prompt pack - meet vibe coders where they ship
Compare SEO /compare/stratm-vs-segment - engineers in evaluation mode
Dev Newsletters TLDR, Bytes, JavaScript Weekly — $800 CPM, high-intent

Competitive positioning

Where schema correctness is the system primitive.

Infrastructure-first Implicit schema ↑ enforced Typed / Schema-enforced Destination-first Analytics-first Segment PostHog Heap Mixpanel Amplitude Stratm · Typed Analytics

The team

Built by engineers who have lived the problem.

Utkarsh Sharma

Co-founder · CEO

  • 10 years of product engineering
  • CTO at Futwork · Engineering Lead at Unacademy · SDE III at Loco
  • IIT Madras - 3 research publications in robotics & grasp planning

Niteen Autade

Co-founder · Engineering

  • 6 years of full stack engineering
  • SDE-3 at Fynd · Sr. Full Stack at Frapp · IBM
  • M.Tech VJTI Mumbai

Why this team wins this problem

Builder + researcher Combines systems thinking with shipping velocity
Backend + infrastructure Two engineers who understand schema contracts, pipelines, and correctness at depth
Operator-turned-founders Have personally managed analytics debt at scale - built this because they needed it

The ask

Raising $500K Pre-Seed.

Use of funds

Product & Engineering45%

MVP (Capture, Schema, Insights, Journeys) + MVP 1.5 (Replay, Prism, Lineage, Pulse, Fabric)

Go-to-Market25%

Developer marketing, agent ecosystem partnerships, SEO content

Infrastructure20%

ClickHouse, CF Workers, schema registry, production-grade ingest

Operations10%

Legal, compliance, 6-month runway

6-month milestones

Month 3 MVP live — Capture, Schema, Insights & Journeys shipping
Month 4 MVP 1.5 — Replay, Lineage & Pulse launch. 100 active teams.
Month 5 Prism + Fabric launch. First enterprise contracts.
Month 6 9-product platform live. $100K ARR. Seed ready.