Context
Software development just changed forever.
AI writes the code
Leading AI-native companies report 30–90% of new code is now AI-generated - Anthropic, Airbnb, and Microsoft leaders cite meaningful agent output in production. Humans review; agents ship.
AI reads the data
Amplitude AI, Mixpanel Spark, and every analytics platform is racing to add LLM-powered query layers.
The gap nobody solved
Faster codegen outpaces manual taxonomy upkeep. AI analytics layers query events that were never compile-time validated. Garbage in, sophisticated out.
Humans are no longer the right enforcement layer - tooling must. The companies that become trust infrastructure between AI-generated software and AI-powered analytics win the next decade.
The problem
Analytics breaks silently and nobody knows.
The engineer's pain
Ships a refactor → omits buy_cta
Dashboard metric silently drops to zero
Three days debugging to find a renamed event
✗ Rarely compile-time or repo-grounded validation. Trust breaks after deploy.
The PM's pain
Checkout funnel shows 2.3% conversion - or does it?
"Events were renamed in the last deploy" : you know 3 weeks later
AI analytics gives confident answers from unvalidated data
✗ No way to know what you're NOT measuring.
This is not a tooling problem. It is a structural problem. Analytics has no type system.
Competitive gap
Incumbents optimize for flexibility and downstream trust - not compile-time correctness.
Mixpanel
Lexicon and governance exist - but schema discipline is UI-defined and downstream, not compile-time and code-derived.
Validates after ingestion
Amplitude
Strong query and AI layers - but instrumentation correctness is enforced after data lands, not before deploy.
Post-ingestion validation
PostHog
Autocapture and schema tooling prioritize flexibility over a single repo-enforced structural contract.
Flexibility over contract
Segment
Decoupled destination routing (write once, send anywhere). Schema correctness is your problem.
Routing, not correctness
No incumbent treats schema correctness as the compile-time, code-derived system primitive. Features can be copied; workflow lock-in is the bet.
The insight
TypeScript gave JavaScript a type system.
It didn't replace JavaScript. It made application state trustworthy at scale.
TypeScript validates application state. Stratm validates behavioral state.
Typed Analytics. A schema-enforced, structurally-typed, version-controlled behavioral data layer, where every event is declared, every path is validated, and every change is tracked. Compile-time correctness for instrumentation, not just dashboards.
Stratm is building typed analytics infrastructure.
The product
Building instrumentation primitives, intelligence lenses, and infrastructure surface.
i · Instrumentation
Define and capture
Studio Mode · Schema Health ship with MVP SKUs
ii · Intelligence
Analyze and act
+ Heatmaps
iii · Infrastructure
Distribute and govern
Integrations · Audiences
Shipping 9 products in MVP (Capture, Schema, Insights, Journeys, Lineage, Replay, Prism, Pulse, Fabric) · Studio Mode & Schema Health are features of Capture.
Technical differentiation
Structural data. Not just events.
Typical event payload
{
"event": "click",
"element": "buy_cta",
"timestamp": 172946…
}
What Stratm stores
{
"structure": {
"path": ["checkout","order_summary","submit_order"],
"depth": 3,
"schema_version": "v1.4"
}
}
The moat
The schema manifest is load-bearing infrastructure.
The manifest is table stakes. The moat is the system primitive: one schema in the repo, enforced before merge, consumed by analytics, warehouses, and AI - not a settings screen after ingestion.
Once schema.json is committed, CI hooks are wired, and downstream tools
consume the Schema API, switching cost is not "cancel a subscription." It is
rebuild your entire analytics data contract from scratch.
Market opportunity
Stratm sits at the convergence of product analytics, behavioral data infrastructure, and AI-era observability.
TAM · directional
~$18B–25B
Global spend at the analytics × infra × observability intersection
SAM · directional
~$1.5B–4B
Modern web & TS-native teams · structural capture viable
SOM · directional
~$250M–500M
Pre-seed → Series A ICP · bottom-up ARR path
Why now
Go-to-market
Bottom-up developer adoption → top-down PM retention.
Phase 1
Dev Adoption
HN launch, CLI on GitHub, agent prompt pack. Win vibe coders and AI-native builders. Schema commits to repos.
Phase 2
PM Lock-in
Schema Health shows gaps. PM sees value. Budget conversation begins. Renewal driven by Schema Health + Journeys.
Phase 3
Infrastructure
Schema API consumed by warehouse, AI tools, Amplitude. Switching cost becomes architectural, not contractual.
Key acquisition channels
Competitive positioning
Where schema correctness is the system primitive.
No incumbent treats schema correctness as the primary primitive - not a feature on the side. That is the category we are creating.
The team
Built by engineers who have lived the problem.
Utkarsh Sharma
Co-founder · CEO
- 10 years of product engineering
- CTO at Futwork · Engineering Lead at Unacademy · SDE III at Loco
- IIT Madras - 3 research publications in robotics & grasp planning
Niteen Autade
Co-founder · Engineering
- 6 years of full stack engineering
- SDE-3 at Fynd · Sr. Full Stack at Frapp · IBM
- M.Tech VJTI Mumbai
Why this team wins this problem
The ask
Raising $500K Pre-Seed.
Use of funds
MVP (Capture, Schema, Insights, Journeys) + MVP 1.5 (Replay, Prism, Lineage, Pulse, Fabric)
Developer marketing, agent ecosystem partnerships, SEO content
ClickHouse, CF Workers, schema registry, production-grade ingest
Legal, compliance, 6-month runway
6-month milestones
stratm.dev · [email protected] · "Typed Analytics — correct by design."